A user oriented model to improve internet searching success.

Weideman, M.

Poster in CPUT Research Day. 28 November. Cape Town, South Africa.

Weideman, M. 2008. A user oriented model to improve internet searching success. Poster in CPUT Research Day. 28 November. Cape Town, South Africa. Online: http://web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-digital-library-seo/

It is claimed that up to 80% of Internet users depend on search engines to find relevant information on the Internet. However, research has proven that Internet searching success in general can be as low as 20 - 30%. A number of factors were found which contribute to Internet searching success. These include the number of results obtained, the number of keywords used and the skills of the searcher. The higher the number of results, the more unlikely it is that a user will find a relevant result. Research has shown that as many as 99% of searchers do not read any answers past the third result page. The number of keywords used affects results in two ways. Too few keywords often produce too many answers, while too many keywords could produce no answers at all. Searcher skills have been researched extensively, and the general findings include that advanced search operators are seldom used. The use of Boolean operators, for example, is very low. The top 50 terms used during a given month on a large search engine has shown some alarming trends. Most searches were specified using one or two terms only. Furthermore, many terms were so general in nature that no relevant answer can be expected. Other queries appeared to be for rather mundane topics. A simple model was suggested to produce a relatively high percentage of searching success. The number of keywords used should be pitched on a sliding scale, where the complexity of the query determines its length.
  1. Burke, M, Hornof, A, Nilsen, E, Gorman, N. 2005. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(4):423-445.
  2. Neethling, R. 2008. User profiles for preferences of search engine optimisation versus paid placement. Unpublished M.Tech thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town.
  3. Nielsen, J. 2007. Response Times: The Three Important Limits. http://www.useit.com/papers/responsetime.html [08 June 2008].
  4. Visser, EB, Kritzinger, W, Weideman, M. 2006. An empirical study on the implementation of the Chambers model: Search engine optimisation elements and their effect on website visibility. Proceedings of The 8th annual Conference on WWW Applications, Bloemfontein, South Africa. September 05-08.
  5. Weideman, M. 2008. Website Visibility: The Theory and Practice of Improving Rankings. Chandos Publishing: Oxford. ISBN: 9781843344735. To be published December 2008.
  6. Weideman, M. 2005. FOIOTI: An implementation of the conceptualist approach to Internet searching. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 71(1):11-25.
Full text of Conference Poster No 0136: A user oriented model to improve internet searching success.

Digital Library with full-text of academic publications on website visibility, usability, search engines, information retrievalhttp://web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-digital-library-seo/

Back to Home page