A pilot study on the development and evaluation of an interactive computer-based training (CBT) module.

Lourens, S. & Weideman, M.

Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on WWW Applications. 29-31 August. Cape Town, South Africa.

Lourens, S. & Weideman, M., 2005. A pilot study on the development and evaluation of an interactive computer-based training (CBT) module. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on WWW Applications. 29-31 August. Cape Town, South Africa. Online: http://web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-digital-library-seo/

The main objective of this study is to prove whether or not an interactive multimedia computer-based training (CBT) module will help learners understand learning material better. The secondary objective is to measure if learners will show a positive attitude towards CBT in the COBOL programming language in a Development Software 1 programme. A relatively large number of learners fail DOS1 each year and it is increasingly apparent that it would be prudent to supplement the learning experiences of these learners. Research has shown that learners using interactive multimedia material can have a learning advantage over learners receiving classroom-based education. However, little research has been done in the teaching of programming languages. The methods employed in this study include the development of a Macromedia Flash CBT module that supports various animations, and the evaluation of the module’s effectiveness as a method for introducing learners to COBOL. Furthermore, the effects of CBT on learners’ attitude were evaluated. Summative evaluation was used in an online pre-test/post-test approach to determine the effectiveness of the module. After completion of the module, a formative approach was used and the experimental group was asked to complete an online questionnaire for evaluation of the module and their attitude towards it. Preliminary results seem to indicate that the even though the experimental group (who made use of the CBT module) has obtained a higher mean gain score than the control group (who received traditional classroom-based instruction), it proved to be insignificant. Gain scores between the two groups did not indicate any significant improvement however; it appears as if CBT education has a positive effect on learners’ attitudes. The conclusion of this study is that CBT did not show a significant improvement in learner performance, but lead to heightened motivation in teaching the COBOL programming language.
  1. Abraham, D., Crawford, L., Lesta, L., Merceron, A. & Yacef, K. 2001. The Logic Tutor: A Multimedia Presentation. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 3. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.imej.wfu.edu/articles/2001/2/03/printver.asp (Accessed 4 May 2004).
  2. Adams, G. 1992. Why Interactive? Multimedia and Videodisc Monitor. 10(3):20-24.
  3. Alessi, S.M. & Trollip, S.R. 1991. Computer-based instruction: methods and development. 2nd Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  4. Ambler, S.W. 1998. Building object applications that work: your step-by-step handbook for developing robust systems with object technology. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ambler, S.W., 2000. User interface design: tips and techniques. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.ambysoft.com/userInterfaceDesing.pdf (Accessed 5 December 2004).
  5. Ambler, S.W. 2001. The Object Primer 2nd edition: The application developer’s guide to object orientation. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.ambysoft.com/theObjectPrimer.html (Accessed 23 January 2005).
  6. Balasubramanian, V. 2002. Design and evaluation of a web-based training tool for the User Action Framework explorer. Unpublished thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
  7. Biggs, J. 1999. Teaching for quality learning. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  8. Blanchard, D. 1990. A Computer Aided Instruction program: teaching the disk operating system to community college learners. Unpublished thesis, Center for advancement of education, Nova University.
  9. Blank, G.D., Pottenger, W.M., Kessler, G.D., Roy, S., Gevry, D.R., Heigl, J.J., Sahasrabudhe, S.A. & Wang, Q. 2002. Design and Evaluation of Multimedia to Teach Java and Object-Oriented Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2002:17-18.
  10. Compeau, D. & Higgens, C. 1995. Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2):118-143.
  11. Constantine, L.L., 1995. Constantine on Peopleware. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yourdon Press.
  12. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13:319-338.
  13. Deacon, A., Paxton, M. & Carr, T. 2000. Creating a project-based learning environment for commerce courses by customizing an Office suite. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.meg.uct.ac.za/papers/citte.htm (Accessed 8 December 2003).
  14. Deer, R., Wright, K. & Solomon, A. 1995. A comparison of student performance following instruction by computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture method for an undergraduate athletic training program. KAHPERD Journal, 31:18-20.
  15. Delclos, V.R. & Hartman, A. 1993. The impact of an interactive multimedia system on the quality of learning in educational psychology: An exploratory study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(1): 83–93.
  16. Dick, W. & Cary, L. 1996. The systematic design of instruction. 4th Edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
  17. Dykman, A. 1994. Ready for the technoworld? Vocational Education Journal 69(6), 28-24.
  18. Eckerman, D.A., Abrahamson, K.l., Ammerman, T., Fercho, H., Rohlman, D.S. & Anger, W.K. 2004. Computer-based training for food services workers at a hospital. Journal of Safety Research, 35:317-327.
  19. Engum, S.A., Jeffries, P. & Fisher, L. 2003. Intravenous catheter training system: Computer-based education versus traditional learning methods. The American Journal of Surgery, 186:67-74.
  20. Frith, V. 1997a. Evaluation of courseware for higher education. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.civeng.uct.ac.za/caleng/eval.htm (Accessed 26 March 2004).
  21. Frith, V. 1997b. How can CAL make teaching and learning more effective? [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.civeng.uct.ac.za/caleng/caladv.htm (Accessed 26 March 2004).
  22. Frith, V. 1997c. The evaluation of computer-based teaching aids. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.civeng.uct.ac.za/caleng/caleng.htm (Accessed 26 March 2004).
  23. Gains, C., Johnson, W. & King, T. 1996. Achieving technological equity and equal access to the learning tools of the 21st century. T.H.E Journal, 23(11):74-78.
  24. Gaytan, J.A. & Slate, J.R. 2003. Multimedia and the College of Business: A Literature Review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2):186-205.
  25. Goldstein, I.L. 1993. Training in organizations – needs assessment, development, and evaluation. 3rd Edition. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  26. Hannafin, M.J. & Peck, K. 1988. The design, development and evaluation of instructional software. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  27. Hashiba, M., Inagawa, K., Matsuto, T., Motonaga, A., Yamakawa, T. & Akazawa, K. 2000. Application of the RealAudio package to computerized medical lectures. Medical Informatics & The Internet in Medicine, 25(4):239-245.
  28. Hix, D. & Hartson, H.R. 1993. Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process. New York: John Wily & Sons, Inc.
  29. Hiltz, S.R. 1994. The virtual classroom. Learning without limits via computer network. Norwoord: Ablex Publishing.
  30. Hofsetter, F.T. 1993. Design and construction of a multimedia technology catt. Techtrends, 38(2):22-24.
  31. Issa, R.R.A., Cox, R.F. & Killingsworth, C.F. 1999. Impact of Multimedia-based Instruction on Learning and Retention. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(4):281-290.
  32. Jeffries, P.R., Wool, S., & Linde, B. 2003. Technology-based vs. Traditional Instruction: A Comparison of Two Methods for Teaching the Skill of Performing a 12-Lead ECG. Nursing Education Perspective, 24(2):70-74.
  33. Jung, D.J., Keel, R.O. & Irons, L.R. 1998. Interactivity in distance education: The Missouri IVPTF experiment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Social Impact of Information Technologies, October 1998. St. Louis: Missouri.
  34. Kozma, R. 1994. A reply: media and methods. Educational Technology in Research and Development, 42(3):11-14.
  35. Leung, H.K.N. 2003. Evaluating the Effectiveness of e-Learning. Computer Science Education, 13(2):123-136.
  36. Lohr, L.L. 2000. Designing the instructional interface. Computers in human behaviour. 16(1):161-182.
  37. McKethan, R. & Everhart, B. 2001. The Effects of Multimedia Instruction and Lecture- Based Instruction On Learning and Teaching Cues of Manipulative Skills on Preservice Education Teachers. Physical Educator, 58(1):2-13.
  38. Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability engineering. Boston: Academic Press.
  39. Nielsen, J. & Levy, J. 1994. Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4):66-75.
  40. Savage, T. & Vogel, K. 1996. Multimedia: A revolution in higher education? College Teaching, 44(4):127-131.
  41. Skinsley, M. & Brodie, D. 1990. A study of the effectiveness of computer assisted learning in physical education. Research Supplement, 7:14-16.
  42. Technology and student success. 3rd Edition. 2002. McGraw-Hill Ryerson:171.
  43. Wegner, S.B., Hollaway, K.C. & Garton, E.M. 1999. The effect of internet based instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(3).
Full text of Conference Proceedings No 0116: A pilot study on the development and evaluation of an interactive computer-based training (CBT) module.

Digital Library with full-text of academic publications on website visibility, usability, search engines, information retrieval

Back to Home page