The measurement of user behaviour using free non-Google tools

Schnelle, Alexander; Weideman, Melius

Published Online

Schnelle, A. & Weideman, M. 2014. The measurement of user behaviour using free non-Google tools. Working Paper, Munich University of Applied Science, Munich. Available online: http://www.web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-abstracts-seo.htm

ABSTRACT.
The number of websites available on the Internet is increasing by the hour, resulting in more competition for user attention between them. Before improving a website, it is important to know who the users are, how they interact with a website and what their preferences are. For collecting this kind of data, Web analytic tools are often used as instruments. Google Analytics is an industry standard, and probably the most well-known one. Alternatively there are many other free, non-Google tools available for online measurement.
The purpose of this research project was to compare some of these free tools. They were identified and tested, their tracked data was compared, as well as their user friendliness and accuracy. A number of usable, free, non-Google Web analytic tools were found. They mostly differed in the way they track data. The main difference was in the display of the data. Every user should base a decision on which tool to use on his/her personal preferences of data presentation, and needs.
REFERENCES
  1. Anselin, L., Kim, Y.W. & Syabri, I. 2004. Web-based analytical tools for the exploration of spatial data. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6(2): 197-218.
  2. Beri, B. & Singh, P. 2013. Web Analytics: Increasing Website's Usability and Conversion Rate. International Journal of Computer Applications, 72(6): 35-38.
  3. Cutler, M. & Sterne, J. 2000. White paper: E-Metrics: Business Metrics for the New Economy. Chicago, IL: NetGenesis.
  4. Dixon, B. 2013. Google Analytics: Avoiding Premature Speculations. Search Engine Journal. Online: http://www.searchenginejournal.com [25 October 2014].
  5. Eirinaki, M. & Vazirgiannis, M. 2003. Web mining for web personalization. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 3(1): 1-27.
  6. Ferguson, R. 2012. Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5): 304-313.
  7. Kent, M.L., Carr, B.J., Husted, R A. & Pop, R.A. 2011. Learning web analytics: A tool for strategic communication. Public Relations Review, 37(5): 536–543.
  8. Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A. & Wrede, C. 2006. The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2): 127-141.
  9. Phippen, A. 2004. An evaluative methodology for virtual communities using Web analytics. Proceedings of the International Networks Conference (INC 2004), United Kingdom, Plymouth, 6-9 July: 535-544.
  10. Plaza, B. 2009. Monitoring web traffic source effectiveness with Google Analytics: An experiment with time series. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 61(5): 474-482.
  11. Plaza, B. 2011. Google Analytics for measuring website performance. Tourism Management, 32(3): 477-481.
  12. Prasetio, A., Sharif, O.O., Turipanam, D.A., & Partono, A. 2013. The Impact of Traffic Source on Page Views. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Systems, Indonesia, Bandung, 20-22 March: 15-16.
  13. Roesler, P. 2014. Nielsen: Mobile traffic gaining ground over desktop numbers. Jacksonville Business Journal. Online: http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville [25 October 2014].
  14. Schmitt, E., Manning, H., Yolanda, P., Tong, J. 1999. Measuring Web Success. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
  15. Visser, E.B. & Weideman, M. 2011. Search engine optimisation versus Website usability—conflicting requirements? Information Research, 16(3). Online: http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper493.html [2 August 2014].
  16. Weideman, M. 2012. Academic Content - a valuable resource to establish your presence on the Web. Plenary keynote at the 2nd International Conference on Integrated Information, Budapest, Hungary, 30 Aug - 03 Sept. Online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813003297# [7 August 2014].
  17. Weideman, M. 2013. Googling South African academic publications - search query generation methods. Proceedings of the SAICSIT 2013 Conference: A connected society, East London, South Africa, 7 – 9 October. Online: http://www.web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-digital-library-seo.php.
  18. Weischedel, B., Huizingh, E.K.R.E. 2006. Website optimization with web metrics: a case study. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Electronic commerce: The new e-commerce: innovations for conquering current barriers, obstacles and limitations to conducting successful business on the internet (ICEC '06), USA, New York, August: 463-470.

Full text of Working paper No 0078: The measurement of user behaviour using free non-Google tools

Digital Library with full-text of academic publications on website visibility, usability, search engines, information retrieval

Back to Abstracts page