Relationship between the use of dynamic webpages and high visibility through SEO

Pandya, Rushi; Weideman, Melius

Published Online

Pandya, R. & Weideman, M. 2014. Relationship between the use of dynamic webpages and high visibility through SEO. Working Paper, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town. Available online: http://www.web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-abstracts-seo.htm

ABSTRACT.
The look-and-feel of a website plays a vital role in first impressions of a visitor. Basing a website on static design might present a company's products/services to the visitor as being out of date. Static webpages normally do not offer user interaction, and are not the preferred option for online business and e-commerce platforms. One alternative is to use dynamic webpage design – it could provide a more positive user experience. However, if a dynamic website is not created with search engine optimisation in mind, it might reduce the visibility of the website to search engine crawlers. Therefore, it is required to find ways to mitigate the negative influences of dynamic webpages on visibility. A dynamic website was developed and its visibility monitored. After recording initial results, techniques were used to cancel the negative influence of elements of dynamic webpages on visibility. It was found that crawlers have trouble in navigating dynamic websites, and URLs were adapted to reduce this effect. Positive results were also achieved by feeding crawlers with components of static webpages.
REFERENCES
  1. Anonymous. 2008. Google Webmaster Central Blog. [Online]. Available: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html [22 August 2014].
  2. Bruce, W.N., Rosy, S. 2006. How Reliable are Website Rankings? Implication for e-business advertising and internet search, 7(2):238.
  3. Conjecture corporation. n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-an-seo-writer.htm [17 April 2014].
  4. Cullen, R. 1998. Does performance measurement improve organizational effectiveness? A post-modern analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement, September 1997. London: Newcastle-upon-Tyne: 22-56.
  5. Ledford, JL. 2009. Search Engine Optimization. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 10-79.
  6. Pandya, R. 2014. Rushi's CrickyGeeky. [Online]. Available: www.crickygeeky.com [20 October 2014].
  7. Smith, A. 2004. An evaluation of Web development tools. South African Journal of Information Management, 6(4). [Online]. Available: http://www.sajim.co.za [16 July 2014].
  8. Sullivan, D. n.d. The Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors. [Online]. Available: http://searchengineland.com/seotable [23 August 2014].
  9. Thelwall, M. 2002. Subject gateway sites and search engine ranking. Online Information Review 26(2):101-107.
  10. Weideman, M. 2009. Website Visibility: The Theory and Practice of Improving Rankings. Cambridge: Chandos. 179-205.
  11. Zhang, J. and Dimitroff, A. 2004. Internet search engines' response to metadata Dublin Core implementation. Journal of Information Science 30(4):310-320.
  12. Zhang, J. and Dimitroff, A. 2005. The impact of Webpage content characteristics on Webpage visibility in search engine results (Part I). Information Processing and Management, 41:665-690.
  13. Zhao, L. 2004. Jump higher: Analyzing web-site rank in Google. American Library Association, 23(3):108-119.

Full text of Working paper No 0034: Relationship between the use of dynamic webpages and high visibility through SEO

Digital Library with full-text of academic publications on website visibility, usability, search engines, information retrieval

Back to Abstracts page